The Socioeconomic Benefits
Generated by Eastern Iowa Community College District
State of Iowa Executive Summary
March 3, 2003
M. Henry Robison & Kjell A. Christophersen
INTRODUCTION
How do the EICCD Service Area economy and the State of Iowa
benefit from the presence of Eastern Iowa Community College
District (EICCD)?
An obvious question often asked, but rarely answered with more than
anecdotes. In this study, CCbenefits, Inc. applied a comprehensive
economic model they developed with funding from the Association for
Community College Trustees (ACCT). The model, which took over a
year to develop, was designed to capture and quantify the economic
and social benefits of community colleges (CCs). It relies on data
collected from individual CCs, and translates these into common
sense benefit-cost and investment terms. The model has been
subjected to peer review and field-tested on over 220 different CCs
throughout the nation. Model results are based on solid economic
theory, carefully drawn functional relationships, and a wealth of
national and local education-related data. The model provides
relief from the all-too-common "advocacy analyses" that inflate
benefits, understate costs, and thus discredit the process of
higher education impact assessment.
Four types of benefits are tracked: (1) contributions to
local job and income formation (regional economic benefits); (2)
higher earnings captured by exiting students; (3) a broad
collection of social benefits (improved health, reduced crime,
lower welfare, and unemployment); and (4) the return to taxpayers
for their CC support.
Regional Perspective
Eastern Iowa Community College District Economy
EICCD accounts for $220.7 million of all annual earnings in the
EICCD Service Area economy (see map). The earnings explained by
EICCD are equal to that of roughly 7,047 jobs. The earnings and job
effects break down as follows:
EICCD Operations and Capital Spending
EICCD pays wages and salaries, which generate additional incomes as
they are spent. Likewise, EICCD operating and capital expenditures
generate still further earnings. Altogether, these earnings account
for $42.1 million annually in the EICCD Service Area economy (equal
to that of 1,355 jobs).
Higher Earnings Due to Past Instruction
Each year students leave EICCD and join or rejoin the local
workforce. Their added skills translate to higher earnings and a
more robust EICCD Service Area economy. Based on current
enrollment, turnover, and the growth of instruction over time, the
local region workforce embodies an estimated 3.4 million credits of
past and present instruction (credit and non-credit hours). The
accumulated contribution of past and present EICCD instruction adds
some $178.6 million in annual earnings to the EICCD Service Area
economy (equal to that of 5,691 jobs).
Student Perspective
The student's perspective on the benefits of higher education is
the most obvious: he or she sacrifices tuition and current earnings
for a lifetime of higher earnings. For every credit completed EICCD
students will, on average, earn $84 more per year each year they
are in the workforce. Alternatively, for every full-time year they
attend they will earn an additional $2,372 per year. In the
aggregate (all exiting students), the higher earnings amount to
some $15.6 million per year for each year they remain in the
workforce.
From an investment standpoint, EICCD students will enjoy a 21% rate
of return on their investments of time and money, which compares
favorably with the returns on other investments, e.g., the
long-term return on US stocks and bonds. The corresponding B/C
ratio (the sum of the discounted future benefits divided by the sum
of the discounted costs) is 6.7, i.e., for every $1 the student
invests in EICCD education, he or she will receive a cumulative of
$6.69 in higher future earnings over the next 30 years or so. The
payback period (the time needed to recover all costs) is 7.2
years.
Taxpayer Perspective
State and local government spent $19,137,321 in support of EICCD
during the analysis year. Is this a good use of taxpayer money? Our
analysis indicates that the answer is a resounding yes: returns far
outweigh the costs, particularly when a collection of social
savings is included in the assessment. For example, persons with
higher education are less likely to smoke or abuse alcohol, draw
welfare or unemployment benefits, or commit crimes. This translates
into associated dollar savings (avoided costs) amounting to some
$37 per credit per year, counted as an indirect benefit of EICCD
education. When aggregated across all exiting students, the State
of Iowa will benefit from $3.8 million worth of avoided costs per
year, broken down as follows:
Improved Health
EICCD Service Area employers will see health-related absenteeism
decline by 8,244 days per year, with a corresponding annual dollar
savings of $0.9 million. The state will benefit from the
health-related savings of 216 fewer smokers and 44 fewer alcohol
abusers. The corresponding dollar savings are $640,952 and $353,212
per year, now and into the future (these savings include insurance
premiums, co-payments and deductibles, and withholding for Medicare
and Medicaid).
Reduced Crime
Studies show that incarceration drops with each year of higher
education. In the EICCD Service Area, 30 fewer individuals will be
incarcerated per year, resulting in annual savings of $350,695
(combined savings from reduced arrest, prosecution, jail, and
reform costs). Reductions in victim costs (e.g., property damage,
legal expenses, lost workdays, etc.) result in savings of $386,238
per year. Finally, that people are employed rather than
incarcerated adds $167,524 of earnings per year to the economy.
Reduced Welfare/Unemployment
There will be 175 fewer people on welfare, and 43 fewer drawing
unemployment benefits per year, respectively, saving some $657,931
and $338,105 per year.
Taxpayer Return on Investment
The return on a year's worth of state and local government
investment in EICCD is obtained by projecting the associated
educational benefits into the future, discounting them back to the
present, and weighing these against the $19,137,321 state and local
taxpayers spent during the analysis year to support the college.
The analysis is based on the portion of EICCD operations that is
wholly dependent on state and local government support. Two
investment perspectives are possible, one broad and one narrow.
Broad Perspective
Taxpayers expect their annual investment in EICCD to result in
higher lifetime earnings for students and social savings from
lifestyle changes (reduced crime, welfare and unemployment, and
improvements in health). From a broad investment perspective, the
value of all future earnings and associated social savings is
compared to the year's worth of state and local taxpayer support
that made the benefits possible. Following this procedure, it is
estimated that EICCD provides a B/C ratio of 10.2, i.e., every
dollar of state or local tax money invested in EICCD today returns
a cumulative of $10 over the next 30 years.
Narrow Perspective
The narrow perspective limits the benefit stream to state and local
government budgets, namely increased tax collections and
expenditure savings. For example, in place of total increased
student earnings, the narrow perspective includes only the
increased state and local tax receipts from those higher earnings.
Similarly, in place of overall crime, welfare, unemployment and
health savings, the narrow perspective includes only those portions
that translate to actual reductions in state and local government
expenditures.
Note here that it is normal for the state government to undertake
activities wanted by the public, which are unprofitable in the
marketplace. This means that positive economic returns are
generally not expected from government investments. From the narrow
taxpayer perspective, therefore, even a small positive return (a
B/C ratio equal to just greater than 1, and/or a rate of return
equal to or just greater than the 4.0% discount rate used in this
analysis) would be a most favorable outcome, certainly one that
justifies continued taxpayer support of the college. For EICCD, the
narrow perspective results greatly exceed the minimum expectations.
The results indicate strong and positive returns: a RR of 8.4%, a
B/C ratio of 1.7 (every dollar of state or local tax money invested
in EICCD today returns $1.67), and a short payback period of only
12.5 years.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study demonstrate that EICCD is a sound
investment from multiple perspectives. The college enriches the
lives of students and reduces the demand for taxpayer-supported
social services. Finally, it contributes to the vitality of both
the local and state economies.
In sum, the graph below shows that the college explains a total of
3.7% of all earnings ($5.93 billion) generated from all sources in
the economic region.
